4 ms·
I don't understand your comment. Something like: 'entropy shannon machine learning differential' will give more focused results than just 'entropy', certainl
by photochemsyn 4y ago
I don't understand your comment. Something like:
'entropy shannon machine learning differential'
will give more focused results than just 'entropy', certainly. I suppose there is some limit, is that what you mean? Even there, if I add 'literature review' the results get more focused.
- marcosdumay 4y agoIf you add terms until a search engine gets out of results it considers relevant, it will start rewriting your query until it finds relevant results again. Your examples only work because there are plenty of popular sites that talk about this stuff.
- pixl97 4y agoI think what you're addressing here is that search engines are not infinite. I think one of the things that's changed here in the past view years is 'infinite shit SEO engines'. Some of these sites are obvious and you can type random statements and see that some series of garbage sites attempt to give hits on it. There are less obvious versions of these sites, and I'm assuming they are much harder for Google to detect. Now things boil down to the Chinese room problem. Take a topic with no 'popular' sites that can work as traffic directors. How can Google determine if you're authoritative on the subject, or if you're just a SEO site spitting out spam?