4 ms·
I can't begin to understand what the perspective of someone who holds value in their head for NFTs is. Are they grifters themselves in an Amway kind of deal? Is
by kodah 4y ago
I can't begin to understand what the perspective of someone who holds value in their head for NFTs is. Are they grifters themselves in an Amway kind of deal? Is there some actual use that I'm just totally missing?
- xmonkee 4y agoyes, everyone i know who’s into nfts is in it for short term hype-riding profits. Its grifters all the way down
- cmckn 4y agoI guess the charitable take is they’re just collectibles. As someone who has a moderate interest in collecting physical things (such as vinyl records) it’s hard to understand why anyone would enjoy “collecting” an entry in a data structure.
- LarryMullins 4y agoCollection of products manufactured with the intent of being collectables is another thing I can't wrap my mind around. Intentionally rare baseball/pokemon/magic trading cards, beanie babies, funko pops... I just don't get it. If you're going to collect something, doesn't it seem more authentic to collect something that was never meant to be collectable but became that way as the passage of time attrited that thing? Things which became collectable organically, rather than being manufactured with the intent of being collectable, stand a much better chance of retaining their value and seem intrinsically more interesting. I guess in some cases the line is blurred. Like stamp collecting, and the existence of limited-run stamps originally intended to entice stamp collectors.
- nerdponx 4y agoI don't get it either, but I think I understand why people do. First is that collecting stuff can be fun. There's an element of the "thrill of the chase" tracking down individual items, and of discovering new things, and of completing a project of some kind. There's also sometimes an element of belonging to a community, The hobby of collecting becomes an activity in and or itself. Second is that it's not entirely about scarcity. Baseball cards are desirable because people like to follow sports and athletes and stats. Funko Pops are desirable because people like pop culture and want figurines of pop culture figures. Fine art is desirable because it ostensibly looks nice (or fits some other definition of "art"). Most NFTs are also "art" or otherwise visually interesting, and moreover represent some kind of techno-futuristic optimism that appeals to people. Of course, things get a little hairy once "real money" gets involved. There are orders of magnitude more money involved than, say, rare books or Magic: The Gathering cards, and the fact that everything is digital and highly liquid (in the financial sense) makes it all seem a lot more accessible. And of course that accessibility, coupled with the thing being poorly understood and widely hyped, makes it a uniquely tempting arena for scams and financial speculation.
- aardvarkr 4y agoCollective mania is a thing. Why do you want that rare Pokémon card? Because all of your other friends play Pokémon and they want it too so it has value to you even though it’s literally just a piece of paper with a cool graphic and happens to be artificially scarce. NFT’s are the exact same thing but instead of it being your school friends that are jealous and obsessed over your rare thing, now it’s a discord community of 10k+ that are going nuts over a golden jpeg. Every NFT project has to have a strong community that is incredibly excited about that artificially scarce collectible. I’ve participated in NFT mintings and it really opened my eyes. They make 10,000 of these randomly generated images and sell them to a rabid community of speculators who are willing to throw hundred if not thousands of dollars at their chance to strike it rich.
- baandang 4y agoI am just too old for NFTs but I can completely understand how that is cool having grown up collecting baseball cards. There is really no valid argument that paying for a jpeg is any more ridiculous than paying for a piece of ultra thin cardboard with a baseball player on it that tends to gain in value based on going back in time in the players career. As if the rookie card being worth more than the second year is purely logical and not just a type of supply/demand herd mentality.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- nickhalfasleep 4y agoI think for many people, they do not understand exactly how people make money on investments, and how they are supposed to feed back into the economy. Everybody wants 100x returns like the early internet produced from communication changes. But it is actually rare event.
- richbell 4y ago"Line Goes Up" is a long but excellent video about NFTs and the people involved with then. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ_xWvX1n9g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ_xWvX1n9g
- _fat_santa 4y agoThe one application of NFT's that I really like is CryptoKitties. Basically you can buy some NFT's and then "breed" them to mint new NFT's. The problem with that project and really all NFT projects is that they are way to expensive. If a CryptoKitty could be had for $5-10 then it would be a fun game, but when each NFT runs you into the hundreds and thousands of dollars, it stops being a game and starts being an investment vehicle. It would be like if Magic the Gathering sold individual cards for $150 and to build an entire deck you would need about $10k. If that were the case, MTG would not be a popular game and everyone in it wouldn't be in it for the game, they would just hope their cards go up in value. TL;DR - NFT's can be a great thing, the prices just need to come back down to earth.
- freejazz 4y agoCyrptokitties are worth "hundreds and thousands of dollars" because they are being used to launder money. There is no other reason.