5 ms·

I guess I don't understand your distinction here on purely logical terms, why the uneven burden of proof? The Warren Report is just that, a report written by h

I guess I don't understand your distinction here on purely logical terms, why the uneven burden of proof? The Warren Report is just that, a report written by humans. Even if you firmly want to believe it, if you read it you'd understand its not really doing anything differently than the tin-foil heads and their books (of the better ones at least). It did not create the reality of its hypothesis along with it, it can't really know what Oswald was thinking.

ceejayoz 4y ago
> I guess I don't understand your distinction here on purely logical terms, why the uneven burden of proof? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot It's possible that "yep, it was a conspiracy" will be confirmed if new data is found/released. That's something it's possible to prove. It's not possible to prove there wasn't a conspiracy.