3 ms·
I like how you topped off the Roman non sequitur with some Latin. Alas, it is correct. Here[1] is an article about "Fogbank." [1] https://www.motherjones.com/p
by User23 4y ago
I like how you topped off the Roman non sequitur with some Latin. Alas, it is correct. Here[1] is an article about "Fogbank."
[1] https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/05/fogbank-america-forgot-how-make-nuclear-bombs/ https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/05/fogbank-america...
- Dylan16807 4y agoWe don't need to make exact replicas of every single old material. "Won't have an effective arsenal within a century" is silly. And that absolutely was not a non-sequitur.
- User23 4y agoThermonuclear weapons have considerably tighter engineering requirements than sidewalks. So much so that the comparison is ludicrous.
- Dylan16807 4y agoEven if you think the comparison is very bad, it's not a non-sequitur.
- User23 4y ago"If Roman cement misconceptions exist then the US hasn't forgotten how to make Fogbank" is literally a non sequitur.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]