4 ms·
Contesting the results of an election is entirely different to publishing location data with the intent to cause physical harm. Disputing election results is a
by Thorentis 4y ago
Contesting the results of an election is entirely different to publishing location data with the intent to cause physical harm.
Disputing election results is also part of the democratic process, even if you disagree with it, and should be encouraged. There is nothing in the public interesting concerned with stalking people.
- SXX 4y agoCan you prove there were ever intent to cause physical harm?
- denlekke 4y agoI read much more intent to cause harm in Trump's Jan 6 tweets than I did in any of Jack Sweeney's but intent is really difficult to prove which makes it a terrible metric for objective moderation
- gmnash 4y agoDisputing elections in good faith and lawfully is part of the democratic process. Incitement of insurrection after lawful means have been exhausted is by definition not part of the democratic process.
- chii 4y ago> Disputing election results is also part of the democratic process, even if you disagree with it, and should be encouraged. no, a democratic election with proper monitoring will not have a dispute on the election result - after all, you would be monitoring the counting process. What happened in jan is not a dispute of the election, it's a refusal to accept the results of the election. Aka, an attempted coup.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- toofy 4y ago> ...*with the intent to cause physical harm*. lets not get this carried away.