3 ms·
If you discovered a post apocalyptic Earth somewhere in the solar system, you wouldn't have any interest in checking it out? It's ok to say no to this, but just
by burkaman 4y ago
If you discovered a post apocalyptic Earth somewhere in the solar system, you wouldn't have any interest in checking it out? It's ok to say no to this, but just be aware that most people consider "because it's there" to be a legitimate and relatable answer to your question.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> most people consider "because it's there" to be a legitimate and relatable answer to your question I don't think hackers, explorers and founders have ever been most people.
- burkaman 4y agoNo, but most people think hacking, exploring, and founding stuff is cool even if they don't do it themselves.
- bavila 4y agoWhat data do you have that demonstrates what "most" people think is "cool" in this respect?
- sophacles 4y agoYou are correct: historically hackers, explorers and founders are significantly more likely to respect "because I can" as a reason for doing something than the average person.
- burkaman 4y agoI think "because it's there" is the more respectable subset of "because I can", covering stuff like climbing Mount Everest and venturing to the South Pole. "because I can" for me often implies something like asserting power over other people or just generally being an asshole.
- idlewords 4y agoVenus is the post-apocalyptic Earth you're looking for.
- TEP_Kim_Il_Sung 4y agoVenus became that way because of its' oceans and no counterbalancing moon.
- shrimp_emoji 4y agoNope; it's because it's closer to the Sun (whose luminosity is increasing over time, btw, so Venus got cooked more and more until it got into a critical greenhouse effect). Venus is also strange for having a retrograde (and very slow) rotation relative to other Solar System planets due to a mix of being close enough to be tidally locked to the Sun and its (now extremely thick) atmosphere creating strong thermal tides that affect its rotation. It used to be thought (and I thought this) that its retrograde rotation was due to impacts in its early history. But, in any case, having moons is unrelated.
- moloch-hai 4y agoIt lost (most of) its rotation because it has no moon, nothing to counter solar tides. Because it lost its rotation, it lost its magnetic field. Because it lost its magnetic field, it lost its hydrogen. Mars lost its hydrogen the same way, because its core froze enough to kill its magnetic field. There is more than one way to go. Venus is in a bad way.
- TEP_Kim_Il_Sung 4y agoYup. Oceans. Ask Anton Petrov. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_fiFzTceZc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_fiFzTceZc
- justinpombrio 4y agoJust want to clarify, in case someone reads this and thinks "like in the movies, where after the apocalypse it's barren and radioactive and very hot or cold and you can't survive outside unless you're wearing a suit". That's not what it's like on Venus. The atmosphere is made mostly of CO2. At the surface, it has a pressure of 93 times that of Earth, and temperature of 464 °C / 867 °F. This is sufficiently hot and pressurized that the atmosphere is neither a gas nor a liquid, it's a supercritical fluid. Wikipedia says that we use supercritical CO2 industrially because of how good it is at dissolving things. The record survival time for a stationary probe on the surface of Venus is 127 minutes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus#Physical_characteristics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus#Physical_characteristics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_fluid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_fluid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observations_and_explorations_of_Venus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observations_and_explorations_...