4 ms·

Please consider https://sso.tax/ https://sso.tax/ before making that an "enterprise" feature.

• IshKebab 4y ago
  I mean yeah, that's working as intended surely? Some of those price differences are pretty egregious but in general companies have to actually make money, and charging more for features that are mainly needed by richer customers is a very obvious thing to do.
  • mdaniel 4y ago
    I believe the counter-argument is that they should charge for features but that security should be available to anyone. Imagine if "passwords longer than 6 chars: now only $8/mo!" That goes double for products where paying for "enterprise" is only to get SAML, which at least in my experience causes me to go shopping for an entirely different product because I view it as extortion
    • IshKebab 4y ago
      Security is available for everyone. It's centralised security that can be easily managed by IT that isn't. I don't see an issue with charging more for SSO though as I said some of the prices are egregious.
• Alifatisk 4y ago
  Very sad to see Bitwarden in this list