4 ms·

From the looks of it, Paul Christoforo = Ocean Marketing. The website [1] lists "Paul@OceanMarketingInc.com" as the only email address, and the bio for the Twi

From the looks of it, Paul Christoforo = Ocean Marketing. The website [1] lists "Paul@OceanMarketingInc.com" as the only email address, and the bio for the Twitter account "oceanmarketting" has his name and picture as avatar. [1] http://oceanmarketinginc.com/Contact-Us.php http://oceanmarketinginc.com/Contact-Us.php

fjarlq 15y ago
I think that's all correct, except for the Twitter account, which I believe was created by another disgruntled customer (Nathan Stansell) a few months ago, following a similar exchange with Paul Christoforo. It looks like Stansell is now retweeting messages related to the new controversy. http://www.natesnetwork.com/Poor-customer-service http://www.natesnetwork.com/Poor-customer-service "2:45 am. Created a Twitter account just so i could Tweet a comment and link to Mr Paul Christoforo at Ocean Marketing. @OceanMarketting - Am i still one little person out of Millions sir?"
- mkr-hn 15y ago
  That was the right account, but it changed. Someone registered the old name and started tweeting stuff. The website was still pulling tweets from the original account a few minutes ago. The new account for the original is https://twitter.com/#!/oceanstratagy https://twitter.com/#!/oceanstratagy
  - fjarlq 15y ago
    Ocean Stratagy? How could either of these misspelled Twitter accounts be legit?
    - eropple 15y ago
      The evidence points to illiteracy.
      - danilocampos 15y ago
        Oh, my goodness. A truly funny comment on Hacker News. Thank you for this.
    - mkr-hn 15y ago
      The original (@oceanmarketting) was linked to the site, including all the tweets from the person who grabbed the name. Then the new one appeared with the same follower/following count, tweets, and profile info as the original. And the original emails had bad spelling.
lambda 15y ago
Yeah, and I like that despite it being (apparently) a one-man job, he decides to threaten "I have about 125 dedicated people to run PR , Blogs , Articles , Videos you have no clue who I am."

fjarlq 15y ago

I think that's all correct, except for the Twitter account, which I believe was created by another disgruntled customer (Nathan Stansell) a few months ago, following a similar exchange with Paul Christoforo. It looks like Stansell is now retweeting messages related to the new controversy. http://www.natesnetwork.com/Poor-customer-service http://www.natesnetwork.com/Poor-customer-service "2:45 am. Created a Twitter account just so i could Tweet a comment and link to Mr Paul Christoforo at Ocean Marketing. @OceanMarketting - Am i still one little person out of Millions sir?"

mkr-hn 15y ago
That was the right account, but it changed. Someone registered the old name and started tweeting stuff. The website was still pulling tweets from the original account a few minutes ago. The new account for the original is https://twitter.com/#!/oceanstratagy https://twitter.com/#!/oceanstratagy
- fjarlq 15y ago
  Ocean Stratagy? How could either of these misspelled Twitter accounts be legit?
  - eropple 15y ago
    The evidence points to illiteracy.
    - danilocampos 15y ago
      Oh, my goodness. A truly funny comment on Hacker News. Thank you for this.
  - mkr-hn 15y ago
    The original (@oceanmarketting) was linked to the site, including all the tweets from the person who grabbed the name. Then the new one appeared with the same follower/following count, tweets, and profile info as the original. And the original emails had bad spelling.

lambda 15y ago

Yeah, and I like that despite it being (apparently) a one-man job, he decides to threaten "I have about 125 dedicated people to run PR , Blogs , Articles , Videos you have no clue who I am."