> the amount you could do in a single contactless transaction (Certainly not me: I will not accept embedded fixed NFC - not in documents, not in bank cards, no

> the amount you could do in a single contactless transaction (Certainly not me: I will not accept embedded fixed NFC - not in documents, not in bank cards, not in general.) Yes. I will rephrase: people were told, "Here are the details of the system: if anything goes wrong, it can only be for 25u". Some people trusted that as a fixed contract. Then, some received the (expectable) communications that the formerly established limit will change. Depending on the country and system, some doubled, some were raised to 150u (if I remember well), with promises to arrive soon at 500u (if I remember well). Other details are not different in nature: if the PSD2 imposed that the via-PIN "signature" has to be provided every 5 transactions, that does not mean that at a later stage this will not be modified to 500. The point is: if it is intrinsic to the system that the configuration can be globally changed, expect it. About the logic: you have to foresee them "slopes", when you see they /are/ "slippery". The fallacy is in assuming the future. It is on the opposite _duly_ to consider the chances.