4 ms·
How will they know? I don't think they'll be able to enforce this except the most obvious cases (where answers are posted by bots without any human review). Cat
by ericbarrett 4y ago
How will they know? I don't think they'll be able to enforce this except the most obvious cases (where answers are posted by bots without any human review). Cat's out of the bag.
- rashkov 4y agoIt’d be neat if chatgpt encoded a signature via steganography of some sort, sort of like a watermark
- DonHopkins 4y agoIt should always include a duck. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9137736 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9137736 https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2013/06/05/duck/ https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2013/06/05/duck/
- robocat 4y agoStack Overflow can firstly warn users that using machine generated text will get you banned. SO can train a model to detect GPT3 output from different models, and then run it over all recently submitted questions and answers. https://huggingface.co/openai-detector https://huggingface.co/openai-detector is already fairly good at detecting ChatGPT generated text: so far my experience is that it says it is fake then it is fake, but it can be fooled into thinking generated text is “real”. Although perhaps a little unfair on those people using GPT to tidy up their spelling and grammar.
- hxugufjfjf 4y agoA text written by a human but tidied up with GPT is not detected as GPT generated text. I've tested this extensively with large volumes of human written text.