2 ms·
No, there really are more sequels today: https://www.radiotimes.com/movies/hollywood-sequels-remakes/ https://www.radiotimes.com/movies/hollywood-sequels-remak
by jimbokun 4y ago
No, there really are more sequels today:
https://www.radiotimes.com/movies/hollywood-sequels-remakes/ https://www.radiotimes.com/movies/hollywood-sequels-remakes/
Key chart:
https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/3/2019/09/Screen-Shot-2019-09-18-at-17.34.17-df1decb.png?quality=90&webp=true&fit=1760,1094 https://images.immediate.co.uk/production/volatile/sites/3/2...
- yamtaddle 4y agoEh, top-20 grossing only and starts in the early 80s. There are lots of remakes and sequels (and some "cinematic universes"!) in the 1900-1950 range—not infrequently, one of the remakes is far better-known or better-regarded now than the original. [EDIT] I've actually looked into this before and if you have better data on it I'd genuinely love to see it—I couldn't find any. [EDIT EDIT] What I was most interested in was seeing whether there was a major change in this in the 60s-80s when director-as-auteur trend took over after the Studio System was broken up—arguably we're kinda trending back toward a Studio System sort of arrangement, so it'd be interesting to see if a ~century-long graph that includes wider-ranging data looks U-shaped.
- muffinman26 4y agoThere are a lot of movies in the 30s and 40s that a cursory analysis wouldn't notice are remakes, but totally are. For example, Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers movies are all nominally unique characters, but most of them have identical pacing.