4 ms·
(I'm not an astrophysicist). They possibly are referring to the initial age of the universe times the speed of light (13.8 billion light-years), as if it was st
by anotheraccount9 4y ago
(I'm not an astrophysicist). They possibly are referring to the initial age of the universe times the speed of light (13.8 billion light-years), as if it was static.
Like you infer, "[...] stuff is everywhere, light goes at c, stars and galaxies move, and the Universe is expanding."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/02/23/if-the-universe-is-13-8-billion-years-old-how-can-we-see-46-billion-light-years-away/?sh=494c7e2d1303 https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/02/23/if-t...
- nicksrose7224 4y agoI think it's more likely they got it wrong and are referring to what they assume the size of the universe is. It's hard to grasp why the observable universe is 92 billion ly in diameter