3 ms·
one of these days one of these toys is gonna have IFTT integration or a webhook
by culi 4y ago
one of these days one of these toys is gonna have IFTT integration or a webhook
- epse 4y agoWith buttplug.io (the author) you can already do that. Maybe not IFTT, but you can definitely automate them however you like
- noduerme 4y ago* wash only in your Hitachi smart dishwasher
- oefrha 4y agoPretty sure camgirls have been using vibrators connected to online gifting systems for a long time.
- noduerme 4y agowell see, the problem is those systems are all closed source and centralized through servers run by pimps. A FOSS protocol for remote manipulation of vibrational devices on N-axes is just the sort of thing needed to kick off a committee that'll spend the next ten years drafting a plan to decentralize vaginas. [Edit: Also, blockchain! My GOD why has no one made a vibrator that only vibrates once a payment block is confirmed 6 times?]
- sph 4y agoOT: are camboys a thing? It's not my niche, but I wonder if we will see a shift in the word towards "campeople" or some other unisex name. Not even trying to stir shit, I am genuinely curious. Personally, I don't see anything wrong with gendered names.
- shakna 4y ago"Cammer" is the unisex name in the industry, as far as I'm aware. Though it was more popular with the earlier wave of webcam streaming activity, back in the era of Chatroulette's first rise.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]