4 ms·
No in Tesla's case it is because a person still has to be on the wheel to correct any potential errors.
by 10xDev 4y ago
No in Tesla's case it is because a person still has to be on the wheel to correct any potential errors.
- ilaksh 4y agoYou think if it was failing any significant amount to drive in a safe way, with this wide deployment, there wouldn't be a lot of crashes? Having an AI drive is the best way to make the driver zone out. At this point, it usually fails by going into intersections a little too slowly.
- scott_w 4y agoThere's entire YouTube channels dedicated to videos of Tesla Self Driving doing stupid things like trying to turn into a tram. At scale, 99.99% correct will still kill many thousands of people. Compared to the sheer volume of cars, there aren't actually that many Teslas out there.
- galangalalgol 4y agoThe driver won't zone out if it is only getting it correct a tiny fraction of the time.
- _ea1k 4y agoI enjoy videos on the self driving space and Tesla's technical (not business) approach to it. Its produced results that were actually quite a bit better than I expected at this stage. I still regularly see videos of Tesla's beta software attempting to pull out into traffic in situations that clearly could have very bad outcomes. I still see so much phantom braking that its a collision risk. I wouldn't call it dangerous, in the sense that it is done well enough that the person at the wheel should be able to handle it, but it'd crash a lot without an attentive driver. Its a long way from 99% reliability at this point.
- swyx 4y agoand conveniently ignoring that Cruise and Waymo have been running around for months in San Francisco with fingers crossed no major incident