Its definitely a problem if people are not testing the answers. There often are bugs or nonsense. But it also routinely provides very useful answers, and you c

Its definitely a problem if people are not testing the answers. There often are bugs or nonsense. But it also routinely provides very useful answers, and you can ask it to fix bugs you find. I assume that within the next two years, Stack Overflow will be overtaken by a similar site that defaults to Chat-GPT-like AI answers, and has incentives for human programmers to train it by checking or improving its answers. Unless the Stack Overflow people decide to do something like that themselves. But even this version of ChatGPT often has amazing code answers, and if you could put it in a loop with a compiler/JavaScript runtime that could go pretty far. I imagine a couple more years of larger/better models (maybe with some visual understanding of UIs) etc., and the website will just be "write, test and deploy this entire program for me, here is a list of requirements" -- taking out a lot of not only Stack Overflow's business but also Upwork etc.