3 ms·
You usually start with an observation, Hancock starts with the conclusion and works backwards.
by Hikikomori 4y ago
You usually start with an observation, Hancock starts with the conclusion and works backwards.
- nradov 4y agoThat seems like a deflection. What specifically in Hancock's interpretation does not align with the known facts? I don't particularly care about him one way or another, but if you want to criticize him then please present some actual evidence.
- kodyo 4y agoThat's a lie that sounds smart.
- spaceman_2020 4y agoI’ve watched enough of Hancock to know that he starts with an observation: xyz physical structure doesn’t align with our accepted view of history, and then tries to find a conclusion.