4 ms·

I asked ChatGPT. It replied: It is true that the advancements in artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, have significantly improved the quality and the accu

I asked ChatGPT. It replied: It is true that the advancements in artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, have significantly improved the quality and the accuracy of the generated content. However, this does not necessarily mean that all the originality and the creativity of human content will be lost. In fact, AI can also be used as a tool to enhance human content, by providing suggestions, recommendations, or inspiration. Moreover, the need for personal blogs and other forms of human content will not vanish completely, because there are many aspects of human experience, such as emotions, values, or opinions, that cannot be fully captured or replicated by AI. Therefore, human content will still have its own unique value, and it will continue to be sought after, as long as it provides something that AI cannot, such as a personal perspective, a storytelling style, or a human connection. In terms of the content that will remain, it will probably be a mix of both human and AI content, depending on the context and the purpose. For example, for factual or technical information, AI content might be more reliable and efficient, but for personal or creative content, human content might be more engaging and relatable. Therefore, the content that you would still like to read after AI content took over the Internet will probably depend on your interests, your preferences, and your values.

mrccc 4y ago
In a way, ChatGPT predicts that the content will shift towards AI content on Hacker News – and maybe some philosophy. I think it is currently true that emotions, values, and opinions can't be fully captured by AI – but even this will change at some point. I don't see why it shouldn't be possible to at least give the appearance that it "feels". Based on this answer, I am also curious where this leaves sites like Wikipedia. Will it still be necessary?
- MattGaiser 4y ago
  I think it will be a long time before it really understands what it is saying. I just got it to say that pineapples are not a food source and therefore inappropriate to sell to restaurants.
  - pulvinar 4y ago
    To be fair, it's not that hard to convince humans to believe ridiculous things too. There are plenty of examples out there.
hxugufjfjf 4y ago
I did too. Answer: It's difficult to say exactly how AI tooling will change the content on Hacker News, as it will likely depend on how the tooling is used and what specific features it has. However, it's possible that AI tooling could be used to help moderate the site and identify spam or inappropriate content, or it could be used to provide users with personalized recommendations for articles and discussions based on their interests. It could also potentially be used to assist with tasks such as summarizing long articles or automatically generating discussion prompts based on the content of an article. Ultimately, the impact of AI tooling on the content of Hacker News will depend on how it is integrated and used by the site's administrators and users. I followed up with "Can you provide some concrete examples?". Answer: 1. AI could be used to recommend content to users based on what they have previously upvoted, as well as recent trends among other users. 2. AI could be used to detect malicious content, such as spam, phishing links, or other malicious content. 3. AI-powered moderation tools could be used to detect and moderate conversations more quickly and effectively. This could be used to identify language which is offensive or inappropriate, and automatically remove it from the platform. 4. AI could be used to detect when conversations are getting heated, and intervene to prevent them from escalating into an argument.

mrccc 4y ago

In a way, ChatGPT predicts that the content will shift towards AI content on Hacker News – and maybe some philosophy. I think it is currently true that emotions, values, and opinions can't be fully captured by AI – but even this will change at some point. I don't see why it shouldn't be possible to at least give the appearance that it "feels". Based on this answer, I am also curious where this leaves sites like Wikipedia. Will it still be necessary?

MattGaiser 4y ago
I think it will be a long time before it really understands what it is saying. I just got it to say that pineapples are not a food source and therefore inappropriate to sell to restaurants.
- pulvinar 4y ago
  To be fair, it's not that hard to convince humans to believe ridiculous things too. There are plenty of examples out there.

hxugufjfjf 4y ago

I did too. Answer: It's difficult to say exactly how AI tooling will change the content on Hacker News, as it will likely depend on how the tooling is used and what specific features it has. However, it's possible that AI tooling could be used to help moderate the site and identify spam or inappropriate content, or it could be used to provide users with personalized recommendations for articles and discussions based on their interests. It could also potentially be used to assist with tasks such as summarizing long articles or automatically generating discussion prompts based on the content of an article. Ultimately, the impact of AI tooling on the content of Hacker News will depend on how it is integrated and used by the site's administrators and users. I followed up with "Can you provide some concrete examples?". Answer: 1. AI could be used to recommend content to users based on what they have previously upvoted, as well as recent trends among other users. 2. AI could be used to detect malicious content, such as spam, phishing links, or other malicious content. 3. AI-powered moderation tools could be used to detect and moderate conversations more quickly and effectively. This could be used to identify language which is offensive or inappropriate, and automatically remove it from the platform. 4. AI could be used to detect when conversations are getting heated, and intervene to prevent them from escalating into an argument.