> Considering I can't prove a negative, are you able to prove a positive? Yes. In communist Poland "You submit the content for classification. With documentati

> Considering I can't prove a negative, are you able to prove a positive? Yes. In communist Poland "You submit the content for classification. With documentation. And they send it back with a detailed report of what needs to be censored" was used and designed to keep criticism of ruling class and ruling system out of public view. ---------------------------- Note that I am not claiming that NZ is currently abusing this system, or that NZ system is intended to provide such use. I was responding to > Because plenty of content on FB criticising New Zealand's politicians. that is not really indicating anything, except lack of USSR-level censorship. Maybe confusion was caused because I responded to > But that sort of censorship is fine. You submit the content for classification. With documentation. And they send it back with a detailed report of what needs to be censored and why. treating is a claim in general, not specifically about NZ (I do not want to claim anything about NZ as I am not familiar with it)