3 ms·
It's principle-agent problems all the way down; the compliance and enforcement teams do not care about the best interest of Amazon as a whole. They care about e
by ThrustVectoring 4y ago
It's principle-agent problems all the way down; the compliance and enforcement teams do not care about the best interest of Amazon as a whole. They care about ensuring that the specific KPIs they're evaluated on look good, from top-of-division management down to line members. In all likelihood, Amazon gets exactly what they measure - something like number of tickets closed, number of legal or regulatory incidents, etc.
You always want to identify the job title of who you're talking to and have a good guess as to what their priorities are. It sounds like they repeatedly talked to people whose job description is "close as many support tickets as possible with the hours and staffing resources you have". I'm not at all surprised that the result was getting their tickets closed with zero long-term improvement or concern about their situation.
- marcosdumay 4y agoYes, I'm going with incompetence too. It's just interesting that the game has became so visible rigged that a large player can have obviously no capacity at all on any of their core competences, and keep winning. It used to be that the amount of incompetence was small enough for it to stay hidden, and the general public could stay deceived by just claiming that the player got there by being the best.