5 ms·

This tweet and the next one in the thread show exactly that https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064 https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602

This tweet and the next one in the thread show exactly that https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064 https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064

ethanbond 4y ago
Those tweets the Biden team is requesting are actual dick pics that Hunter never consented to being shared online. You’ve been duped.
- jeffreyrogers 4y ago
  Do you have any evidence for that? I don't see anywhere where it says what the tweets contain. In either case, the claim I made is that twitter removed tweets and banned accounts at the request of certain parties, which remains true and is what the linked images show.
  - shagie 4y ago
    Grab a link, go over to web.archive.org, paste it in, go to the capture from 2020, look at the dick picks of Hunter Biden. https://web.archive.org/web/20201025002626/https://twitter.com/jared87983561/status/1320159679700373504 https://web.archive.org/web/20201025002626/https://twitter.c... - yes, it's a dick pick. Do not click that link if you don't want to see it.
    - jeffreyrogers 4y ago
      Thanks.
  - ethanbond 4y ago
    Yeah, just like they do every single day for reported material that violates their TOS.
    - jeffreyrogers 4y ago
      Sure, I don't disagree with that. But the existence of a backchannel is notable in itself and as far as I know wasn't publicly acknowledged.
      - ethanbond 4y ago
        It’s surprising that the teams around the most powerful political office in the country have communication lines open with media corporations? That doesn’t strike me as notable or surprising at all, even if it’s new information. For this to be surprising, I think one would have to implicitly believe one of a few things: 1) Twitter isn’t a meaningful political battleground, 2) politicians don’t know it’s an important political battleground, or 3) Twitter should treat a content report from “newuser18472” the same as a report from a notable organization or individual. Reasonable things to believe, but IMO not surprising at all to find out they’re false.
freejazz 4y ago
Yeah that crazy dick pic narrative huh?
- jeffreyrogers 4y ago
  I don't know what the contents of the tweets are. What the images show are people affiliated with political campaigns asking twitter employees to remove tweets, which is what I claimed originally.
  - shagie 4y ago
    Grab a link, paste it into web archive, go to the October 2020 capture, see a dick pic. If you want to see one, https://web.archive.org/web/20201024235823/https://twitter.com/JSJX_2/status/1320152593742614529 https://web.archive.org/web/20201024235823/https://twitter.c... You can then judge the question of "did the person in the image consent to having their picture shown on Twitter, or is this in violation California penal code 647(j)(4)?"
    - jeffreyrogers 4y ago
      Thanks. Again, what I claimed was that twitter performed actions at the the request of people affiliated with political parties/campaigns. I didn't make any claims about the content of the tweets or their legality/status under twitter's terms and conditions.
      - shagie 4y ago
        So if these weren't reported by a member of the Biden campaign and instead reported by Hunter Biden himself - would there be an issue? Other than timeliness, would you expect any different resolution if they were reported by a private citizen unrelated to the Biden campaign? If the answer to both of these question is 'no', what is the big deal?
        jeffreyrogers 4y ago

This tweet and the next one in the thread show exactly that https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064 https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598827602403160064

ethanbond 4y ago

Those tweets the Biden team is requesting are actual dick pics that Hunter never consented to being shared online. You’ve been duped.

jeffreyrogers 4y ago
Do you have any evidence for that? I don't see anywhere where it says what the tweets contain. In either case, the claim I made is that twitter removed tweets and banned accounts at the request of certain parties, which remains true and is what the linked images show.
- shagie 4y ago
  Grab a link, go over to web.archive.org, paste it in, go to the capture from 2020, look at the dick picks of Hunter Biden. https://web.archive.org/web/20201025002626/https://twitter.com/jared87983561/status/1320159679700373504 https://web.archive.org/web/20201025002626/https://twitter.c... - yes, it's a dick pick. Do not click that link if you don't want to see it.
  - jeffreyrogers 4y ago
    Thanks.
- ethanbond 4y ago
  Yeah, just like they do every single day for reported material that violates their TOS.
  - jeffreyrogers 4y ago
    Sure, I don't disagree with that. But the existence of a backchannel is notable in itself and as far as I know wasn't publicly acknowledged.
    - ethanbond 4y ago
      It’s surprising that the teams around the most powerful political office in the country have communication lines open with media corporations? That doesn’t strike me as notable or surprising at all, even if it’s new information. For this to be surprising, I think one would have to implicitly believe one of a few things: 1) Twitter isn’t a meaningful political battleground, 2) politicians don’t know it’s an important political battleground, or 3) Twitter should treat a content report from “newuser18472” the same as a report from a notable organization or individual. Reasonable things to believe, but IMO not surprising at all to find out they’re false.

freejazz 4y ago

Yeah that crazy dick pic narrative huh?

jeffreyrogers 4y ago
I don't know what the contents of the tweets are. What the images show are people affiliated with political campaigns asking twitter employees to remove tweets, which is what I claimed originally.
- shagie 4y ago
  Grab a link, paste it into web archive, go to the October 2020 capture, see a dick pic. If you want to see one, https://web.archive.org/web/20201024235823/https://twitter.com/JSJX_2/status/1320152593742614529 https://web.archive.org/web/20201024235823/https://twitter.c... You can then judge the question of "did the person in the image consent to having their picture shown on Twitter, or is this in violation California penal code 647(j)(4)?"
  - jeffreyrogers 4y ago
    Thanks. Again, what I claimed was that twitter performed actions at the the request of people affiliated with political parties/campaigns. I didn't make any claims about the content of the tweets or their legality/status under twitter's terms and conditions.
    - shagie 4y ago
      So if these weren't reported by a member of the Biden campaign and instead reported by Hunter Biden himself - would there be an issue? Other than timeliness, would you expect any different resolution if they were reported by a private citizen unrelated to the Biden campaign? If the answer to both of these question is 'no', what is the big deal?
      - jeffreyrogers 4y ago