3 ms·
The primary source of your "further reading" article is Tucker Carlson. Not saying the claim is incorrect, but are there any trustworthy sources supporting it?
by cauthon 4y ago
The primary source of your "further reading" article is Tucker Carlson. Not saying the claim is incorrect, but are there any trustworthy sources supporting it?
- gjsman-1000 4y agoYes. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-passes-sweeping-recommendation-algorithm-regulations-effect-march-1-2022/ https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-passes-sweeping-re... If you want to verify it yourself, go to China, open Douyin. Plus, the story makes internal sense - for example, pornography and the kind of soft-core porn, heavily revealing clothing, and so forth that appears on TikTok is actually illegal in China. Post it, you'd get it censored and removed.
- the_lonely_road 4y agoYou should see the porn on Reddit. This is an American consumer issue not a foreign nation issue.
- nonethewiser 4y agoGiven that the source is corroborated, looks like the Tucker Carlson source can be trusted. Your opinion on reputation is just that.
- LordDragonfang 4y agoLiars are capable of telling the truth, but that doesn't mean you should assume what they say is true without corroboration. https://www.politifact.com/personalities/tucker-carlson/ https://www.politifact.com/personalities/tucker-carlson/
- nonethewiser 4y agoThe Tucker Carlson peice is accurate. A reasonable person would incorporate that in their opinion of the source. Politifact "fact check", or really anything that calls itself s fact check, isn't a reliable proxy for forming opinion from primary sources.
- hammock 4y ago