3 ms·
This is literally just blameless incident response/postmorteming as practiced by google (https://sre.google/sre-book/postmortem-culture/ https://sre.google/sre-
by pr0zac 4y ago
This is literally just blameless incident response/postmorteming as practiced by google (https://sre.google/sre-book/postmortem-culture/ https://sre.google/sre-book/postmortem-culture/) and a bunch of other tech orgs as well as in industries like aviation and healthcare. Its a well established and supported method for approaching problem solving. Like yeah I can see why it seems a bit ironic in this context but shes not expressing anything nefarious here.
- tru3_power 4y agoExactly. If you take this approach to the FTX incident, you’ll see quickly that the RCA points to SBF being a fraudster.
- AdamN 4y agoIt's also the idea in many safety engineering orgs around how to mechanistically prevent something from happening again even though someone still might try to do the same thing again. In other words, blaming people for mistakes or fraud won't fix the problem since people make mistakes and commit fraud so it will simply happen again. Organizations and governments need to block those mistakes and fraudulent actors from being able to have the impact again that they had previously and we're trying to avoid. That doesn't mean the person at fault can't also be blamed and punished as a warning to others (i.e. one more mechanism to prevent recurrence).