4 ms·
Why would it after all? It’s all mimicry without understanding of any context. It’s going to become more and more real and more convincing but beyond that there
by tartoran 4y ago
Why would it after all? It’s all mimicry without understanding of any context. It’s going to become more and more real and more convincing but beyond that there is still nothing intelligent, just fascinating stochastic immitation.
- Aeolun 4y agoI’m not entirely certain humans are any different though. We’re essentially very sophisticated pattern matching machines, based on our past experience.
- williamtrask 4y agoYour long term memory and embodied sense of purpose are good places to explore this premise.
- euroderf 4y agoNot to mention, how you react to crushing boredom.
- tartoran 4y agoOf course we are/have some kind of sophisticated pattern matching machines, what is language anyway? But we understand context in conversation, at least what we mean by understanding. GPT-3 doesn’t do any of that.
- miltondts 4y agoI'm fairly sure GPT-3 can't do any of that, because it was trained only with text. That is, it was trained without the context we are exposed to. Now imagine if it was trained with a body (similar sensors to what we have) in the real world. I'm not so sure we wouldn't get something indistinguishable from a human.
- tartoran 4y agoThat would be a different story. Imagine its parents trained it or trained itself on data derived from the environment mixed with other bits we could already call its experience. Imagine it then went to some kind of kindergarten with others, then school, them started to look for a partner then a job and so on. Yeah, in that sense we’d be going full circle replicating the life of humans on silicon. If I were still around Id be befuddled as why we went on this track