3 ms·
Getting the balance of this right to prevent a tragedy of the commons turns out to be hard. Element (who funds most of Matrix dev) has released almost everythin
by Arathorn 4y ago
Getting the balance of this right to prevent a tragedy of the commons turns out to be hard. Element (who funds most of Matrix dev) has released almost everything we do as permissive-licensed FOSS open source. As a result, there's a huge ecosystem of folks building commercial solutions on Matrix. But surprisingly little $ actually gets back to Element (or the Matrix Foundation) from those commercial solutions, if any.
- jokowueu 4y agoI don't have any proof but I'm certain Germany must have made some sort of funding for matrix https://matrix.org/blog/2021/07/21/germanys-national-healthcare-system-adopts-matrix https://matrix.org/blog/2021/07/21/germanys-national-healthc...
- yorwba 4y ago> TI-Messenger is gematik’s technical specification for an interoperable secure instant messaging standard. The healthcare industry will be able to build a wide range of apps based on TI-Messenger specifications knowing that, being built on Matrix, all those apps will interoperate. The ones getting most of the money will probably be third-party developers integrating Matrix into their gematik-certified healthcare products.
- Arathorn 4y agoIronically very little of the $ seems to be propagating back to Matrix itself…
- oger 4y agoThe messengerfor German armed forces is based on matrix https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bundeswehr-setzt-kuenftig-auf-Matrix-als-Messenger-4719474.html https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bundeswehr-setzt-kue...
- nradov 4y agoIt's disappointing that Germany decided to go their own way rather than joining DirectTrust and working on the Trusted Instant Messaging Plus open industry standard. It's specifically designed for healthcare. https://directtrust.org/standards/tim-plus https://directtrust.org/standards/tim-plus
- RobotToaster 4y agoWhich somewhat highlights the problem with "permissive" licences, as opposed to copyleft ones like AGPL.
- LadyCailin 4y agoBut would AGPL have gotten traction in the first place? I guess we can’t say for sure, but my guess is no. I think it safe to say that at minimum it would be an additional barrier to entry.
- sschueller 4y agoMastodon and peertube are both AGPL
- LadyCailin 4y agoI’d say the jury is still out on Mastadon (and anyways would not be competitive except for Twitter imploding), and I haven’t even heard of the other one, so I’m not sure this is a compelling argument.
- Arathorn 4y agothe problem of AGPL for Matrix is that it would have likely impeded uptake significantly. But yes, it’s something we’ve considered.
- lgreiv 4y agoAgreed. Ideally, the official policy should be introduced to either fund or contribute to FOSS used.
- account42 4y agoPerhaps its actually good that one company can't capture significant ammounts of money when the goal should be to move away from single-company communication tools. Of course the Foundation does need funding and I think it would be in Germany's / the EU's interest to secure that.