4 ms·
for mozilla neither, for mullvad probably good, i think many trust the mozilla brand more than mullvad mullvad is an average vpn provider also its important
by systems 4y ago
for mozilla neither,
for mullvad probably good, i think many trust the mozilla brand more than mullvad
mullvad is an average vpn provider
also its important to note, that many question that VPNs provide any security at all , i think for 7 dollars you pay their email relay and phone masking seem like the more interesting feature and value
- hardwaresofton 4y ago> mullvad is an average vpn provider I was under the impression that mullvad was best-in-breed. A lot of bad VPN companies running around these days and Mullvad is a clear HN favorite.
- zinodaur 4y agoMullvad UX is pretty sweet - I especially like how they don't force signups, and still let you open ports. I wish there was a premium tier to let you pay for more bandwidth though, the fact that down speeds are capped at 300MBPS and up speeds much less made it not really usable for me
- sodality2 4y agoI have never experienced this cap. I downloaded at gigabit last time I used it.
- everfrustrated 4y agoProblem is Mullvad is too reputable. I find everything is blocked as their IPs are very well known and on all lists.
- jorisvansoest 4y agoaverage? Have you read this? [1] I think they do a lot more then other VPN providers! To name a few: - no logging (no hdd in their servers even!) - pay with cash (via post) - audit of their infra [1] https://mullvad.net/en/help/no-logging-data-policy/ https://mullvad.net/en/help/no-logging-data-policy/