3 ms·
Border radius is not 'correct design'. It's subjective design. There are places where `border-radius: 0px` works and places where it doesn't. Context matters mo
by NayamAmarshe 4y ago
Border radius is not 'correct design'. It's subjective design. There are places where `border-radius: 0px` works and places where it doesn't. Context matters more in design.
- alternatetwo 4y agoNeither is separator width ... On a side note, easy to compare by crossviewing.
- fold3 4y agoSince high res screen are becoming the norm, you could argue that border radius are becoming de facto the 'correct design' because it is a more friendly, inviting et legible shape.
- crabmusket 4y agoWhat does the screen resolution have to do with it? Genuinely not sure what the relationship is. I could imagine sharp corners appearing more hostile when the pixels are smaller?
- antonyh 4y agoI have a high res screen, and I preferred the squared corners.
- fold3 4y agoHigher ppi help for rendering curved lines cleanly without jagged anti-aliasing. It's a known fact that typefaces that have curved, humane shapes are more legible. That is why it is bad practice to use something like futura for long text. I am assuming rounded corners in boxes follow that logic.
- rosmax_1337 4y agoCame here to post this, saw your post and went to agree instead. Really though, some design aspects are objective, but some are not. The author of the page seemed to be relatively on point though about whats objective and whats not.