3 ms·
The part that sort of gets me here is that given that she wasn’t convicted of patient harm (questionable, but that’s the verdict), I don’t have any real interes
by bpodgursky 4y ago
The part that sort of gets me here is that given that she wasn’t convicted of patient harm (questionable, but that’s the verdict), I don’t have any real interest in sending her to prison for defrauding investors.
The investors were wealthy morons who invested with 0 research on the technical feasibility of the company. They deserved what they got. Do some due diligence next time.
- A_D_E_P_T 4y ago11 years for defrauding "investors" who literally hoodwinked themselves and couldn't bother to do basic due diligence is egregious.
- thefaux 4y agoHoodwink the entire public and nearly bring down the entire financial system, get a government bailout. Hoodwink a few rich investors, go to jail. Both at taxpayer expense.
- foolfoolz 4y agowhite collar crime isn’t crime
- jdthedisciple 4y agoThat's not how law and justice work. "The home owner has been a prick to his neighbours anyway, the guy who robbed him shouldn't have been sent to prison"
- ShivShankaran 4y agoThat's what I don't get about this case. It looks like she ticked off few politicians. Playing with investors money is literally abc of startups. I don't understand this case at all
- causality0 4y agoDefrauding rich people is much more legally dangerous than murdering poor people through deliberate negligence.