3 ms·
No, we love Wikipedia and all the abuses bother us more than we benefit from a momentary partisan edge.
by LawTalkingGuy 4y ago
No, we love Wikipedia and all the abuses bother us more than we benefit from a momentary partisan edge.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 4y agoSmall potatoes when at the end of the day wikipedia is one of the few great websites we have left. No ads, tracking, or megacorps. Plenty of transparency.
- ccn0p 4y agoThere's a collective of thought police massaging a lot of the content to convey a certain narrative and it's all done under the veil of "transparent community-driven moderation". I wouldn't be surprised if much of this effort is done by the megacorps you claim aren't involved.
- yeet_yeet_yeet 4y agoCould you provide an example?
- ccn0p 4y agoAs the article of this post points out Larry Sanger is pretty vocal about how biased the content is and how changes to try and provide any semblance of a fair and balanced perspective are edited out of existence oftentimes by small numbers of people.