4 ms·
Not just political. Half the articles I read are spun like pr pieces lately, at least when it comes to organizations and people (even dead people) Random one I
by barbariangrunge 4y ago
Not just political. Half the articles I read are spun like pr pieces lately, at least when it comes to organizations and people (even dead people)
Random one I read last night
> The realization that Fitzgerald had improved as a novelist to point that Gatsby was a masterwork was immediately evident to certain members of the literary world.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/F._Scott_Fitzgerald https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/F._Scott_Fitzgerald
Editors aren’t even trying to appear objective any more. It’s like the news. I think this is becoming the commonplace on Wikipedia and I hate it
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- yeet_yeet_yeet 4y agoThe quality of the topic directly correlates with the quality of editors it attracts. So of course The Great Gatsby is going to have a terrible article. Because it's a miserable book If you care so much about The Great Gatsby, then you should invest your time improving the article.
- barbariangrunge 4y agoThe implication, I suppose, being that I’m a low quality person? Charming