3 ms·

Sorry, what is your point? What are you trying to contribute?

• lbotos 4y ago
  I’m not dain, but your choice of language is confusing. You are attempting to communicate on the internet and you are not being easily understood. It’s your choice if you’d like more people to understand you or not.
  • harry8 4y ago
    "I don't understand this, are you saying x..?" vs "what" Spot the difference in terms of being confusing. But he does understand now without assistance so we're all good, right?
    • sgammon 4y ago
      would you mind explaining? i still don't get it
• harry8 4y ago
  You didn't understand and now you do. I guess those who upvoted the original comment also did? It's taken a back and fourth of 5 comments to establish that clearly. BTW I'm not sure using a mental illness as a superfluous pejorative is a useful approach but ymmv.
• rippercushions 4y ago
  > SBF has used at least one cpu attached to a network on the critical path of his actions. I've read that sentence of yours at least 5 times now and it still makes no sense to me. Would you care to elucidate?
  • _dain_ 4y ago
    OP was using "cpu attached to a network" to mean "computer" and "critical path of his actions" as something like "business model". he's saying that politicians, journalists, regulators, etc, got bamboozled by what was at root a very ordinary fraud, because it was enabled by fancy technology.