2 ms·

I am certain the advertisers love this. All ads are intrusive, and generally the more intrusive the more expensive.

• kevinsundar 4y ago
  Yes but intruding into private audio calls is something users would be heavily suspicious of. It's not hard to imagine a non technical users thinking "OMG they're showing me ads based on my calls". Lots of people already think this. Also its one thing to show an expensive ad on a screen that the user is actively looking at (that might actually be effective), and another to show an expensive ad on a screen that 95% of users are not looking at.
  • api 4y ago
    If true this will end up selecting for less technical people, which will mean it'll turn into an ad feed full of quack garbage that is aggressively marketed to less technical people.
  • soco 4y ago
    But the ads they show will be based on your calls right? Because, how else...
    • mcculley 4y ago
      Why would they have to be based on the calls? Facebook already knows a lot about the participants.
      • ceejayoz 4y ago
        Has Facebook ever indicated they're capable of a "yep, we've got enough info on everyone, we're good" attitude?
        • mcculley 4y ago
          My reply was to “how else…”
• iceburgcrm 4y ago
  The call to action piece is missing because even if you see something you want to click-on you will avoid it because you have a live call