3 ms·
I agree. After using both for a long time, I have to say KDE is less painful and faster in operation. MacOS has a lot of inconsistent or weird keyboard shortc
by NayamAmarshe 4y ago
I agree.
After using both for a long time, I have to say KDE is less painful and faster in operation.
MacOS has a lot of inconsistent or weird keyboard shortcuts. There's no proper window management, HDMI volume cannot be controlled, can't launch apps like VSCode or Terminal using keyboard shortcuts like Ctrl+ Alt + C and Ctrl + Alt + T. The shell takes like 2 seconds to load when opening terminal.
Yes, MacOS is more beautiful OOTB but KDE hands down wins in the workflow and UX department.
- tgv 4y agoYou can always install Quicksilver. It's pretty handy. I've bound it to ctrl-alt-space, and F is enough to launch Firefox, M to launch Mail, I enough to launch iTerm, etc., without creating shortcuts or editing settings. And if you want to launch some application with overlapping initials, type one or two more characters. And it's free.
- NayamAmarshe 4y agoI installed ZorinOS instead and it's working great now but thanks for the recommendation, I'll give it a try.