3 ms·

Apparently getting under their desks was on the off-chance their school is far enough away to avoid being incinerated but still close enough for a pressure wave

Apparently getting under their desks was on the off-chance their school is far enough away to avoid being incinerated but still close enough for a pressure wave to blow out all the glass in the windows and turn it into projectiles.

pfdietz 4y ago
This came in handy when that meteor exploded over Chelyabinsk a few years ago. A teacher remembered the training and had everyone hide under desks, and they were spared laceration from the blown-in windows.
- int_19h 4y ago
  In Russia, this kind of training is not a long-gone relic - there's a class in school that's dedicated to survival in various situations, covering all kinds of stuff from emergency first aid to making shelter in the wilds. A subset of that is dealing with anthropogenic disasters, and a subset of that is civil defense. If I remember correctly, we had two hours covering nukes alone - likely targets in the vicinity, what kind of damage to expect where, how to build fallout shelters, when to evacuate etc. So far as I know, this all is still taught in schools there.
  - lostlogin 4y ago
    Probably quite handy if that is all the training you get before your call up and your country is threatening nuclear war.
    - int_19h 4y ago
      In Soviet times, the class was called "preliminary military training", and focused more on that aspect - not quite to the point where they'd shoot things, but it would involve timed field-stripping an AK, for example, and reading military topographic maps. After 1991, the military aspects were stripped out, although in many schools they turned into an opt-in afterschool "patriot club" or some such. These were the primary source of videos like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek. Recently, they've announced that they'll be reviving the old Soviet format, so it'll become mandatory for all high schoolers again, beginning with the next school year (starting in September, 2023).
michaelcampbell 4y ago
I went to school in the 70's and _we_ had no such drills, but being in tornado alley, plenty of those. That said, I suspect these drills were more for theatre, like most of the TSA is now - put up a big visible show that you're doing _something_. Reasonable people can disagree.
CamperBob2 4y ago
Do the math. There's a damned good chance that you are, in fact, in the zone where duck-and-cover survival measures are effective.
- dsfyu404ed 4y ago
  Everyone, especially in pseudo-intellectual circles like HN sneers at the whole "duck and cover" thing but any grade schooler can look a the concentric circles on a map and tell you that the area in which you'd best protect your noggin from the drop ceiling dropping a little more than designed is far greater than the area in which burns are a problem.
_carbyau_ 4y ago
Honestly, seems like a couldn't-hurt move. Too close? Incinerated. Doesn't matter. Goldilocks nearby enough for glass shrapnel? Dodged some glass by being under desk! Win! Far away? Heard a distant boom while under desk. Hard to fault really.
- unsupp0rted 4y ago
  The tradeoff is raising generations of children terrified of nukes destroying their world at any moment. Better safe than sorry, as you suggested, but it's not a zero cost strategy.
  - _carbyau_ 4y ago
    While true, at that point in time the parents were also similarly terrified. Schools educate children to fit into society. That was society at the time.

pfdietz 4y ago

This came in handy when that meteor exploded over Chelyabinsk a few years ago. A teacher remembered the training and had everyone hide under desks, and they were spared laceration from the blown-in windows.

int_19h 4y ago
In Russia, this kind of training is not a long-gone relic - there's a class in school that's dedicated to survival in various situations, covering all kinds of stuff from emergency first aid to making shelter in the wilds. A subset of that is dealing with anthropogenic disasters, and a subset of that is civil defense. If I remember correctly, we had two hours covering nukes alone - likely targets in the vicinity, what kind of damage to expect where, how to build fallout shelters, when to evacuate etc. So far as I know, this all is still taught in schools there.
- lostlogin 4y ago
  Probably quite handy if that is all the training you get before your call up and your country is threatening nuclear war.
  - int_19h 4y ago
    In Soviet times, the class was called "preliminary military training", and focused more on that aspect - not quite to the point where they'd shoot things, but it would involve timed field-stripping an AK, for example, and reading military topographic maps. After 1991, the military aspects were stripped out, although in many schools they turned into an opt-in afterschool "patriot club" or some such. These were the primary source of videos like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxjYfl05ek. Recently, they've announced that they'll be reviving the old Soviet format, so it'll become mandatory for all high schoolers again, beginning with the next school year (starting in September, 2023).

michaelcampbell 4y ago

I went to school in the 70's and _we_ had no such drills, but being in tornado alley, plenty of those. That said, I suspect these drills were more for theatre, like most of the TSA is now - put up a big visible show that you're doing _something_. Reasonable people can disagree.

CamperBob2 4y ago

Do the math. There's a damned good chance that you are, in fact, in the zone where duck-and-cover survival measures are effective.

dsfyu404ed 4y ago
Everyone, especially in pseudo-intellectual circles like HN sneers at the whole "duck and cover" thing but any grade schooler can look a the concentric circles on a map and tell you that the area in which you'd best protect your noggin from the drop ceiling dropping a little more than designed is far greater than the area in which burns are a problem.

_carbyau_ 4y ago

Honestly, seems like a couldn't-hurt move. Too close? Incinerated. Doesn't matter. Goldilocks nearby enough for glass shrapnel? Dodged some glass by being under desk! Win! Far away? Heard a distant boom while under desk. Hard to fault really.

unsupp0rted 4y ago
The tradeoff is raising generations of children terrified of nukes destroying their world at any moment. Better safe than sorry, as you suggested, but it's not a zero cost strategy.
- _carbyau_ 4y ago
  While true, at that point in time the parents were also similarly terrified. Schools educate children to fit into society. That was society at the time.