4 ms·
It was ukrainian rocket.
by vbezhenar 4y ago
It was ukrainian rocket.
- PoliticsTalker 4y ago[flagged]
- vbezhenar 4y agoIt was defensive rocket indeed. Explosion site is obviously too small for a real attack rocket. It would blow up everything in a much larger radius.
- terramex 4y agoS-300 are also used by Russia as offensive missiles since July. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/russia-now-firing-s-300-surface-to-air-missiles-at-land-targets-in-ukraine-official https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/russia-now-firing-s-30... https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-attack-kills-dozens-of-civilians-in-ukraine-hours-before-planned-annexations-11664531345 https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-attack-kills-dozens-of-...
- vbezhenar 4y agoThis is lies. But anyway Poland border is too far away from the launch sites for S300 even if someone would try to do that.
- PoliticsTalker 4y ago
- u10 4y ago? There have been plently of reports of Russia using S-300 missile systems in the ground attack configuration. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-63247287 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-63247287 And it is not unreasonable that the missiles may have originated from Belarus, since Russia has sortied out of the country throughout the war.
- vbezhenar 4y agoS300 is defensive missile. It makes no sense to waste it like that when you have plenty of other missiles in your arsenal. Those reports were from ukrainian rockets which failed to intercept attacking rockets. Ukraine does not want to accept this fact that they kill their own citizens with their own missiles, so they spread that kind of misinformation. BBC is not trustworthy source as UK fights on Ukraine side. Don't you think it's kind of ironic to have title "Russia’s stock of weapons running low" just when Russia bombarding entire Ukraine with hundreds of rockets as I write it. This BBC article has "Posts on social media have claimed these S-300 missiles have been repurposed by Russia to hit land targets" source. Sorry, this is nonsense source in my opinion.
- u10 4y agoWhat does or doesn't make sense doens't really matter if there is literal evidence of Russia firing S-300 missiles in ground to ground strikes. > Those reports were from ukrainian rockets which failed to intercept attacking rockets This doesn't track either, if that were the case it would be incredibly suspicious that these intercepts are failing and just through sheer bad luck that the failed intercepts consistently land on Ukrainian forces or residential areas at incredibly high rates. > Don't you think it's kind of ironic to have title "Russia’s stock of weapons running low" just when Russia bombarding entire Ukraine with hundreds of rockets as I write it. No, whatever Russia may constitute necessary reserves to actually fight a war with NATO and simply running out of missiles are two different things. Much like the reports of Russia going to the DPRK to ask for assistance in providing artillery shells, it is literally not the case that Russia is running out of artillery shells, but more likely Russia seeks to backstop the current usage to maintain necessary strategic reserves. And it doesn't really contradict the notion that Russia is in fact running out of PGM's, given that the S-300's are being used for ground attack, which Russia has massive stockpiles of and aren't really needed in the current conflict.
- rsj_hn 4y agoCorrect, the S-300 is a sophisticated missile designed to intercept highly maneuverable airplanes that have a number of defenses. The idea that you would shoot such an expensive missile at a fixed ground target - in this case, a farm along the Polish border, where it hit a tractor and killed the tractor driver -- is crazy, and of course completely incompatible with the "Russia running out of missiles" narrative. What is much more likely is the simple explanation that these are AA missiles that Ukraine fired, trying to intercept a Russian missile or drone, and they missed their target, hitting the farm. That an AA missile failed to intercept and caused damage to infrastructure is completely normal for AA systems and has happened several times before -- an AA missile missed its target and hit an apartment building in Kharkov and another hit an office complex in Kiev. AA systems don't have a 100% interception rate, and those that don't intercept fall and cause damage in inconvenient places. As is usually the case, the simplest explanation is often the most plausible, whereas the most inflammatory explanation is what is promoted in media. Note that even Poland is urging people to remain calm and wait for an investigation, so they are actually more responsible than Western media.
- 7952 4y agoEven if it was a Ukrainian missile the reason it was fired was because of the Russian invasion. Firing a missile in defence and accidentally hurting someone is much more forgivable.
- PoliticsTalker 4y agoAnd the Russian invasion has been eight years in the making since the US-backed Maidan Coup of 2014. It's cause and effect all the way down.
- timeon 4y ago> It's cause and effect all the way down. Ukraine is sovereign country Russian has no right to invade it whatever you think Maidan.
- PoliticsTalker 4y agoThe Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Luhansk and Donetsk autonomous regions have high percentages of ethnic Russians and voted for Russian sovereignty. In Donetsk 99.2% voted for Russian sovereignty. I would say it's fine to invade those regions.
- betaby 4y agoOh, I see. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Research_Agency https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Research_Agency
- PoliticsTalker 4y ago
- timeon 4y agoNot saying that it is not true but those are just two photos on Telegram. Do you have something more?
- PoliticsTalker 4y ago[flagged]
- timeon 4y agoSo no independent source with two pictures without context. That sounds like manipulation.
- bloak 4y agoInteresting. If that turns out to be true then Western European media are going to look a bit silly and untrustworthy. But nothing new there: by the time reliable information is available the media has usually moved onto the next "breaking" story. In any case, whoever's missile it was, it was presumably an accident and I don't suppose any diplomatic or military people are getting very excited about it whatever the noise on social media.
- timeon 4y agoYou seem to be bit too excited in your fantasies.
- bloak 4y agoDid you reply to the wrong message? Or did I reply to the wrong message? Your reaction is confusing. Anyway, latest headlines are saying things like "Poland missile ‘unlikely’ to have been fired from Russia" so the media did, in fact, manage to correct the misleading initial reports within about 12 hours.
- avmich 4y agoWhy do you think so? :)
- sam_lowry_ 4y agovbezhenar has a history of erring on Putin's side
- vbezhenar 4y agoI definitely not erring on Zelensky's side, that's for sure. I'm trying to stay neutral, but Russian propaganda so far was much more convincing to me compared to Ukrainian one, so I might err on Putin's side despite not liking him at all.
- avmich 4y agoYou realize how much Ukraine has to lose playing like this?
- vbezhenar 4y ago
- bsagdiyev 4y agoOr Russia as a surface to surface as of this summer.
- justsomehnguy 4y agoIt's 900km+ from nearest Russian positions. Listed surface to surface mode for S300 is 120km.
- bsagdiyev 4y agoSure -- I was just refuting that only Ukraine was using them. This appears to have been an AA miss causing an accident.