3 ms·
If you want to understand you could have a look at any of the stories about Trump, about anything he's been accused of over the years. Take note of the differe
by MrPatan 4y ago
If you want to understand you could have a look at any of the stories about Trump, about anything he's been accused of over the years. Take note of the difference in language used, the choice of words etc.
Well, that's different, because in Trump's case it was obvious he did it all. After all, the NYT told us. Or at least, they heavily implied it, even though nothing was proven. Waaaait a minute.
- bilbo0s 4y agoIn fairness, they're heavily implying it here as well. Which is also a problem. In none of these incidents are any of these investigations complete. So even if it is obvious SBF is a crook, or Trump is a crook, it's not right to be out "heavily implying" guilt. Used to be we only did that kind of thing to street criminals on the local news, (and I had a problem with it then). Now we're doing it all the way up to people like DSK and the President of the US. This is bad. CNN/FOX/WSJ/NYTimes/BBC etc are so irresponsible that people have begun to believe this is appropriate journalistic behavior. It's not.
- freejazz 4y agoCare to provide any actual examples?