2 ms·
Did you read the comment before grabbing your pitchfork? It very clearly says "top 3", I'm not sure how you missed that. I'm criticizing your tone because it re
by joenot443 4y ago
Did you read the comment before grabbing your pitchfork? It very clearly says "top 3", I'm not sure how you missed that. I'm criticizing your tone because it remains reprehensible and vile, the rules are right here if you need time to review them - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
> Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.
Since you seem to be an expert, please do inform the class. When was the last time an individual in the top 3 of the yearly donor list went to prison? Please be specific.
- freejazz 4y agoI don't know and I never claimed to be an expert. You are the one who asserted something without any basis, not me. Either form the basis or don't. There is nothing wrong with my tone, I'm just pointing out the obviously missing context to your post. What you quote about the rules has nothing to do with my post. If anyone is flamebaiting, it's you with the baseless partisan assertion.
- joenot443 4y agoWhat is the context you think is missing, though? You haven't been specific at all, you're just vaguely trying to say I'm incorrect about something without saying exactly what it is. Why must everything be called "partisan" to Americans when it involves your political circus?