3 ms·

If he did, I think it'd be the first time a top 3 Democrat donor goes to prison. If I had to make a guess, I'd imagine the current government which he helped fu

If he did, I think it'd be the first time a top 3 Democrat donor goes to prison. If I had to make a guess, I'd imagine the current government which he helped fund will be kind to him.

phone8675309 4y ago
If he's arrested I wouldn't be surprised if the guards that are supposed to enforce the suicide watch take a long break and come back to find him dead.
starkd 4y ago
Of course, there is the exception Harvey Weinstein. But his situation was difficult to sugar-coat.
freejazz 4y ago
Did you even bother to google something like "Top democratic donor jailed" before posting this?
- joenot443 4y ago
  - freejazz 4y ago
    Your post is completely made up, and remains so, so I'm not sure why you are criticizing my comment. And yeah, Buck is a result that hits from the past few months. I'm just wondering what you actually did to reach the belief that big democratic donors don't ever go to jail? Like, any research at all?
    - joenot443 4y ago
      Did you read the comment before grabbing your pitchfork? It very clearly says "top 3", I'm not sure how you missed that. I'm criticizing your tone because it remains reprehensible and vile, the rules are right here if you need time to review them - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes. Since you seem to be an expert, please do inform the class. When was the last time an individual in the top 3 of the yearly donor list went to prison? Please be specific.
      - freejazz 4y ago
        I don't know and I never claimed to be an expert. You are the one who asserted something without any basis, not me. Either form the basis or don't. There is nothing wrong with my tone, I'm just pointing out the obviously missing context to your post. What you quote about the rules has nothing to do with my post. If anyone is flamebaiting, it's you with the baseless partisan assertion.
        joenot443 4y ago
        What is the context you think is missing, though? You haven't been specific at all, you're just vaguely trying to say I'm incorrect about something without saying exactly what it is. Why must everything be called "partisan" to Americans when it involves your political circus?

If he did, I think it'd be the first time a top 3 Democrat donor goes to prison. If I had to make a guess, I'd imagine the current government which he helped fund will be kind to him.

phone8675309 4y ago

If he's arrested I wouldn't be surprised if the guards that are supposed to enforce the suicide watch take a long break and come back to find him dead.

starkd 4y ago

Of course, there is the exception Harvey Weinstein. But his situation was difficult to sugar-coat.

freejazz 4y ago

Did you even bother to google something like "Top democratic donor jailed" before posting this?

joenot443 4y ago
- freejazz 4y ago
  Your post is completely made up, and remains so, so I'm not sure why you are criticizing my comment. And yeah, Buck is a result that hits from the past few months. I'm just wondering what you actually did to reach the belief that big democratic donors don't ever go to jail? Like, any research at all?
  - joenot443 4y ago
    Did you read the comment before grabbing your pitchfork? It very clearly says "top 3", I'm not sure how you missed that. I'm criticizing your tone because it remains reprehensible and vile, the rules are right here if you need time to review them - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes. Since you seem to be an expert, please do inform the class. When was the last time an individual in the top 3 of the yearly donor list went to prison? Please be specific.
    - freejazz 4y ago
      I don't know and I never claimed to be an expert. You are the one who asserted something without any basis, not me. Either form the basis or don't. There is nothing wrong with my tone, I'm just pointing out the obviously missing context to your post. What you quote about the rules has nothing to do with my post. If anyone is flamebaiting, it's you with the baseless partisan assertion.
      - joenot443 4y ago
        What is the context you think is missing, though? You haven't been specific at all, you're just vaguely trying to say I'm incorrect about something without saying exactly what it is. Why must everything be called "partisan" to Americans when it involves your political circus?