3 ms·
Can you present some evidence from history or psychological evidence? Throughout the history men have fought war and died in wars. How many wars were fought by
by sudhirc 4y ago
Can you present some evidence from history or psychological evidence?
Throughout the history men have fought war and died in wars. How many wars were fought by women?
In modern times women are in the defense forces, how many women have chosen combat duties and made supreme sacrifices?
Ofcourse there are exception.
- staticman2 4y agoMen don't want to be house husbands because they want to fight in wars? Are you a man and should I assume you signed up for every war, as your Y chromosone dictated?
- sudhirc 4y agoI am speaking about gender roles with war as an historical example. > Are you a man and should I assume you signed up for every war, as your Y chromosone dictated? Are you arguing men aren't predisposed to solve their problems physically? If this behaviour is uniformly distributed across men and women then why you don"t see equal number of crimes by either genders.
- staticman2 4y agoWe were talking about how many men today want to be a househusband. I fail to see what that has to do with historical wars. The comparison would be men today and if they are signing up for wars. Are you? If not why bring up war? Also we were talking about what men want. Does the fact men fought in wars imply they wanted to fight in wars? Did men in history during times of peace sit around saying to themself 'I hope someone starts a war so I have an excuse to stab a guy and get away from my wife and kids?' "Are you arguing men aren't predisposed to solve their problems physically?" Assuming you are a man... unless you are Tony Soprano and you go around hitting people with a baseball bat you probably don't "solve your problems physically". So why write a sentence like "Are you arguing men aren't predisposed to solve their problems physically"
- 1659447091 4y ago>> Throughout the history men have fought war and died in wars. How many wars were fought by women? This makes it sound like the world would be better off if all the men stayed home raising the kids and away from things like international relations while having the women take care of all the larger societal functions
- sudhirc 4y agoI agree. Women are much better at organizing societies and solving problem non voilently. India have seen many such queens all through the history[0]. Queens like Ahilyabai Holkar, Naiki Devi, Rani Durgavati are from recent history. Indian society appreciated motherhood. But it also accepted women freely in the roles traditionally reserved for men. This is the society I want with additional reforms. Issue with recent activism is two folds. Tendency to demean the motherhood and also make men feel guilty for being their natural self. This is I do not want. [0] https://www.thebetterindia.com/292468/brave-indian-queens-in-history-ahilyabai-holkar-abbaka-chowta-rani-chennama-durgavati/ https://www.thebetterindia.com/292468/brave-indian-queens-in...