4 ms·
The main issue is that GitHub is used by OP's company as a work service. There should be expectation that if a company is still trusting someone as an employee
by inawarminister 4y ago
The main issue is that GitHub is used by OP's company as a work service.
There should be expectation that if a company is still trusting someone as an employee - then for WORK he should be allowed to use whatever business tools the company he's employed in has paid.
Imagine, if you will - a financial analyst getting banned from Bloomberg Terminal due to some issues in Bloomberg.com.
Isn't that silly?
- hotpotamus 4y agoI find most aspects of social media silly, and combining it with a git repository especially so. But I still don't understand what it is that people want here - to use the government (as Libertarians would say, men with guns) to force Bloomberg to sell their services to that financial analyst?
- Dylan16807 4y agoKeep in mind that corporations are artificial legal constructs. If the government wants to put rules on companies with thousands of employees, that's very different from putting rules on people.
- hotpotamus 4y ago"corporations are people, my friend." - Mitt Romney