3 ms·
In a different way, if you're a service worker (especially female) and found a job at a hostel/restaurant, you should contact the nearest trade school and ask t
by orwin 4y ago
In a different way, if you're a service worker (especially female) and found a job at a hostel/restaurant, you should contact the nearest trade school and ask them if they discourage female internship/apprenticeship at the restaurant.
Sadly, in those place it is easy to be put in a "she said/he said" situation, and since you're not in the public eye, nobody will really care, especially not the policeman who took the second rape complaint, and your lawyer will only tell you to log the complaint to the police and that she will follow up and call you once she found a third or fourth occurence (that's crazy to me that two complaints is not enough btw).
- MandieD 4y agoAt least sharia law is open in its contempt for women with its stated valuation of a woman’s testimony at half that of a man’s.
- iinnPP 4y agoI obviously don't think anyone should be the subject of violence, let alone rape. I can understand however, that in a society where the truth is seen as a negative, why more than a person and their potential bestie is needed to testify against anyone for anything major. More so when the laws against perjury are more often used in a dishonest way to take the truth and silence it. We have a serious problem with honesty.
- michaelt 4y agoEh, loads of crime can only be prosecuted because of the victim's testimony. Let's say Bob thinks Charles is an asshole, so he goes to Charles's house and beats him up. Charles has no CCTV in his home. The police can see he's been beaten up, but the only thing identifying Bob is Charles's testimony. Bob says it wasn't him, he was at home watching TV. Is it just for Bob to be convicted?
- thfuran 4y ago>Let's say Bob thinks Charles is an asshole, so he goes to Charles's house and beats him up.[...]Is it just for Bob to be convicted? Of course.
- dsfyu404ed 4y ago>Is it just for Bob to be convicted? No. If Bob beat the shit out of Charles there should be a mountain of circumstantial evidence pointing in that direction. Witness testimony is just the cherry on top.
- michaelt 4y ago> there should be a mountain of circumstantial evidence Like what? Neighbours didn't see anything. Bob and Charles once had a minor dispute over one parking in front of the other's house. The cops didn't check for DNA or fingerprints. Bob's claim he was watching TV would fit with his normal habits, he is a film lover.