4 ms·
You're picking and choosing what parts of the comment to base your opinion on, and in the process you've transformed it into an entirely different comment. As a
by maxbond 4y ago
You're picking and choosing what parts of the comment to base your opinion on, and in the process you've transformed it into an entirely different comment. As a result the first half of your comment contradicts the second. At this point the ball is just entirely in your court; if you're going to deliberately misread this comment then there's nothing more I can do or say to convince you you've made an error.
- Dylan16807 4y agoI have no idea how you think my comment is contradictory. Maybe just focus on the tl;dr? You accused someone of bringing in outside information they should not have. I assert that, while they were very rude, the information they brought in was correct to bring in. What am I missing? I promise promise promise I am not deliberately misreading anything. If we go back to the very start, you said "I don't think it's okay to call someone a bootlicker, or to reference their views from one thread in another". I'm not defending the bootlicker thing! I'm defending the referencing of views in this case, because and only because they are directly relevant. You said two things were wrong, I think one of them is not wrong. That's not "picking and choosing" in any negative way. I don't know why you ever thought I was defending the bootlicking accusation. But I didn't accuse you of misreading me on purpose.