4 ms·

So great! And then you plussed it with an Easter Egg (418)!

• greenyoda 15y ago
  That's not an Easter egg; it's a legitimate status code from RFC 2324 (April 1, 1998): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_418 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_418
  • nickloewen 15y ago
    That doesn't make it not an easter egg, though. Most 'easter eggs' function perfectly for what they are, they're just also amusing and not entirely necessary.
    • pitiburi 15y ago
      You, sir, have just found the perfect nickname for my girlfriend.
  • pluies_public 15y ago
    Quite a few RFCs published on April 1st are to be considered with somewhat of a grain of salt, cf. RFC 1149 (http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt)