2 ms·
I don’t believe we disagree on that point; these are technically newspapers. I could have written it better, but I was trying to say that they are exploiting th
by 1123581321 4y ago
I don’t believe we disagree on that point; these are technically newspapers. I could have written it better, but I was trying to say that they are exploiting the widespread impression that something that looks like a newspaper is established and trustworthy.
If cheap digital production, unused newsprint capacity and better data continue to make it financially viable to invent and distribute new newspapers every couple of years, then the reputation to exploit (the deceit) will fade away. Or perhaps the low media trust found in recent surveying will continue, to the same effect.
- jtbayly 4y agoI think you’re right. Something about this is certainly dishonest. I am struggling to figure out what exactly. Fake newspaper websites are also a scourge, typically pushing some particular product. But interestingly, in this case I struggle to see what exactly the difference is. Perhaps it’s because I have such a low view of newspapers in the first place…