That was such a flagrant straw man, I nearly choked on my coffee. I don’t even necessarily disagree with their points, but appealing to ageism in such a lazy ar

That was such a flagrant straw man, I nearly choked on my coffee. I don’t even necessarily disagree with their points, but appealing to ageism in such a lazy argument doesn’t score points with me either. If the author is convinced of the strength of their argument, why did they need to add that? Are we not tired enough of playing sides yet that we can get back to using reason?