3 ms·
I don’t find the “kids in their 20s” stuff very compelling and it kinda unnecessarily weakens the argument. It’s a pretty stretched argument, fresh grads are l
by awinder 4y ago
I don’t find the “kids in their 20s” stuff very compelling and it kinda unnecessarily weakens the argument.
It’s a pretty stretched argument, fresh grads are likely writing some code on these solutions, but there’s undoubtedly egads of “adults in the room” discussing policy, overseeing employees, in the team management chain.
Additionally if we are gonna commit ageism war, there’s a cottage industry of 50+ers who are consuming this obvious garbage and then participating in a democracy based on it. I submit ridiculousness rages across the entire age spectrum.
- deepsquirrelnet 4y agoThat was such a flagrant straw man, I nearly choked on my coffee. I don’t even necessarily disagree with their points, but appealing to ageism in such a lazy argument doesn’t score points with me either. If the author is convinced of the strength of their argument, why did they need to add that? Are we not tired enough of playing sides yet that we can get back to using reason?
- kwertyoowiyop 4y ago20-somethings got us to the moon in the 1960s and are making reusable rockets right now, so I guess they must have SOME talents.