4 ms·
When I say these advertisers I mean the large, multinational, corporate ones. The whales that for a company like Twitter would be a large percentage of their r
by threeseed 4y ago
When I say these advertisers I mean the large, multinational, corporate ones.
The whales that for a company like Twitter would be a large percentage of their revenue.
- philipov 4y ago
- omeze 4y agoHow do you expect OP to answer this question? Companies don’t publish the revenue breakdown by customer in their quarterly reports, only people on Twitters internal finance team would be able to (illegally) answer this for you. We can only wait for next quarters earnings report and make the inference.
- mercurywells 4y agoEarnings report from where exactly?
- foobarian 4y agoSurely the OP was asking a rhetorical question in order to gently hint that what the OOP was saying were opinions not grounded in fact.
- ethanbond 4y agoYou don't think it's a reasonable assumption that the largest consumer brands on the planet are likely to be among the largest ad spenders on an ad network?
- xeromal 4y agoI think they're saying we don't know anything until we have details.
- ethanbond 4y agoWell that's not true. We know lots of things, including that Twitter is an ad network, that large companies tend to spend a lot on advertising, and that they seem to be defecting. That's all information. We happen not to know the exact % of rev from these companies, but that doesn't mean we know nothing.
- Loughla 4y agoSometimes the simplest answer is the right answer. Which makes more sense: 1. Large multi-national corporations make up the largest portion of Twitter's ad revenue. 2. Small, locally owned businesses make up the largest portion of Twitter's ad revenue. To me, #1 makes more sense. If you disagree, I would love to hear why.
- disgruntledphd2 4y agoNot necessarily, if they are more DR focused then none of this matters.