3 ms·
Plants are grown on surfaces measured in tens of percents of country sizes. There is no way to produce enough solar panels to power that.
by 323 4y ago
Plants are grown on surfaces measured in tens of percents of country sizes.
There is no way to produce enough solar panels to power that.
- Narkov 4y agoTalking out aloud here...could vertical farming help here? My theory is that we only use so much land because it needs access to the sun. If we use LED's and stack vertically, we can condense down the footprint.
- knaekhoved 4y agoThe constraint in this hypothetical scenario is space for solar panels, not space for plants.
- danans 4y ago> Plants are grown on surfaces measured in tens of percents of country sizes. That is cereal crop agriculture, which can't be done in vertical farms anyways. Stuff like this is targeted at vegetables and herbs. There are still scale problems, but nothing like the kind associated with cereal crops. The main issue as I understand it is that the sun is free outdoors, so it is hard to justify the cost of the equipment for indoor LED horticulture.
- atonse 4y agoIs nobody looking at using maybe fiber optics to maybe redirect actual sunlight into layers of crops?
- imtringued 4y ago>That is cereal crop agriculture, which can't be done in vertical farms anyways. Then why even bother? Just go straight for artificial starch synthesis then. The saved land can be used to produce everything else on agricultural land. It sounds ridiculous that people are proposing to basically build an VR arcade for plants.