3 ms·
> most probably Citation needed. It is one of the possibilities, and the WHO says that there there's no clear winner yet[1]. Admittedly, this is a reversal of
by wasmitnetzen 4y ago
> most probably
Citation needed. It is one of the possibilities, and the WHO says that there there's no clear winner yet[1]. Admittedly, this is a reversal of previous assessments, where the lab leak theory was all but dismissed entirely.[2]
[1]: https://www.science.org/content/article/open-minded-underwhelming-mixed-reactions-greet-latest-covid-19-origin-report https://www.science.org/content/article/open-minded-underwhe...
[2]: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00877-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00877-4
- mach1ne 4y agoPlease. If you want a citation of official authority, feel free to help yourself to the US Senate report released last week. https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdf https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis...
- Arkhaine_kupo 4y agoThat report was made by interns in the minority party, aka republican staffers. Its propaganda, not backed by anything at all, and uses a ton of purple language to say that the lab leak is unfalsifiable (aka we cannot say outright it didn't happen) and equate that with "probably happened".