3 ms·
Exact replicas are an issue. If you are using AI image generation to replicate the near exact image, then that's illegal. But nobody cares if you copy a nice co
by Abroszka 4y ago
Exact replicas are an issue. If you are using AI image generation to replicate the near exact image, then that's illegal. But nobody cares if you copy a nice code pattern from a GPL code and apply it to your own code base. In the same fashion nobody should care if you make an image in the same art style.
- endisneigh 4y ago> But nobody cares if you copy a nice code pattern from a GPL code and apply it to your own code base this is not true, smh. See Oracle vs. Google.
- int_19h 4y agoOracle v. Google involved actual Java (declarations) code being copied; that it was a derived work wasn't seriously disputed there.
- endisneigh 4y agoCoPilot will return actual GPL code verbatim.
- int_19h 4y agoYes, and that's why I personally believe that the model itself should be considered a derived work of such code. But OP was specifically talking about "code patterns".
- endisneigh 4y agoCopying the code verbatim would fall under copying the code pattern. You talking about changing the name of the variables or something?
- bombcar 4y agoInexact replicas are also an issue, otherwise there would be no issue with distributing MP3s of an Audio CD, as it's a lossy format that is only close to the original. I suspect the courts will treat AI more like a "black box" - they won't care how or why your black box can perfectly play Metallica, only that it does.