> It indicates you're not using the disclaimed marks to indicate origin of goods and services you are offering. You indicate this by doing it. Merely mentionin

> It indicates you're not using the disclaimed marks to indicate origin of goods and services you are offering. You indicate this by doing it. Merely mentioning a trademark someone else owns doesn't infringe on any of the rights owning a trademark gives you. > If the marks are shown alongside a notice disclaiming ownership then a registered trademark owner can't (mitigating circumstances excepting) claim that you're attempting to pass-off using their mark. The standard of trademark infringement is confusion; having a product that is labelled confusingly is illegal regardless of what disclaimers you have, having a product that is not confusing is legal even with no disclaimers. Trademark dilution is a bit broader but, even so, just mentioning a trademark is not dilution. You still have to use it to advertise your own product. Here is a good overview of trademark law: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/metaschool/fisher/domain/tm.htm http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/metaschool/fisher/domain/tm.htm